Surface
water characteristics:
Fresh
surface water provides
drinking water, habitat, recreation, and power generation in
Several
reports[1]
have
addressed surface water conditions in the county over the years,
calculating
the amount of runoff in streams and the capacity for storage in lakes
and
ponds. Stream gauging and hydrologic modeling are used to estimate
runoff and
storage potential in a watershed system by developing an equation that
includes
precipitation, evaporation/transpiration (loss of water through
vegetation),
recharge, and runoff. Stream gauging
by
Ecology in 1975 included 28 sites, with two read daily and 26 read
monthly. USGS gauging in 1997-98
included six sites, with continuous recording by electronic recorders. (Currently, there are xnine gauging sites on
Orcas and
These
reports show that the
hydrology of
Most of
_____________________________________________________________________
Table
x.1
Water
budget components (in inches)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
Island |
Water year |
Precipitation |
Interception
loss |
Simulated
transpiration |
Simulated
direct runoff |
Simulated
deep percolation |
Simulated
change in soil moisture |
|
Lopez |
1997 |
30.65 |
6.73 |
14.22 |
5.59 |
3.03 |
0.68 |
|
|
1998 |
21.05 |
5.86 |
12.2 |
2.15 |
1.94 |
-1.46 |
|
|
avg |
25.85 |
6.29 |
13.21 |
3.87 |
2.49 |
-0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
34.99 |
8.24 |
13.4 |
9.77 |
2.24 |
0.48 |
|
|
1998 |
23.59 |
6.73 |
11.65 |
4.1 |
1.75 |
-1.39 |
|
|
avg |
29.29 |
7.49 |
12.52 |
6.93 |
1.99 |
-0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orcas |
1997 |
40.37 |
9.64 |
13.48 |
14.5 |
1.6 |
0.59 |
|
|
1998 |
25.53 |
7.62 |
11.61 |
6.08 |
1.33 |
-1.65 |
|
|
avg |
32.95 |
8.6 |
12.54 |
10.29 |
1.46 |
-0.53 |
Source:
Estimates of
Ground-Water Recharge, USGS WRIR 02-4114.
This is a summary of annual water budget components using the
deep
percolation model for Lopez,
_____________________________________________________________________
Stored
surface water is an
important resource in the county, capturing winter rainfall for use
during dry
summer months. Over the years, studies
have identified potential sites for additional storage and use. However, as the county has grown the
importance of wetland and recreational areas has increased as well as
impacts
on water quality in the watershed and many of these locations are no
longer
realistic. In order to provide water to
meet growth projections, the Town of Friday Harbor,
Xxstorage
assessment adds
The
quality of
In
October 1999, Ecology issued
a TMDL[2]
ranking
report for
In
order to determine a sustainable
capacity for surface water diversions, the impact of climate trends
must be
taken into account. A sustainable yield
from a surface water source must be based on drought conditions. In 1975, Deitrich commented on the pattern of
dry and wet years represented in the rainfall data from Olga on
Drought
conditions during 1993-4
raised concerns about the sustainable capacity of surface water sources
on
An
estimated water balance for
average conditions can be calculated with the numbers above, but the
Town found
that estimates can vary dramatically with actual conditions. A water balance for 1992 came up with the
following results:
|
1992 Water Balance for
the Town of |
|
|
Beginning lake storage |
292.6 |
|
Inflow:
Estimated runoff to |
206.5 |
|
Aug 1 pumping |
39.3 |
|
Outflow:
Losses to evaporation, leakage |
40.0 |
|
1992 Water Production |
167.4 |
|
Calculated ending storage |
331.0 |
|
Actual ending storage |
219.0 |
Source:
Town of
The
rainfall pattern in 1992 was
such that there were a limited number of storm events that resulted in
significant enough rainfall to saturate the soil and allow for runoff
to the
lake. As a result of this analysis, the
Town decided to use a conservative number for sustainable yield from
their
watersheds, based on a 50-year drought cycle.
Most
of the surface water in the
county is linked by ditches, diversions, and impoundments with a varied
history
of water rights and use. The
The
At
the top of the
·
Surface
water provides drinking water to the majority of designated growth
areas in the
county.
·
There
is a lack of coordinated, cooperative management of the county’s
surface water
resources.
·
In
some areas, water rights to surface water sources exceed sustainable
yield.
·
Planning
for additional storage is essential to addressing growth and protection
of
habitat.
·
Long-term
monitoring is needed to accurately calculate the county’s surface water
characteristics.
X, maps of watersheds, aug1&2, lakes and c creek. Moran park, town boundary, contours.
xxMap,
gauge sites from each
study. Rainfall at Olga.
PDO etc. graph. budget graphic, p67.
[1] See Appendix X, Reports
and studies
[2] total daily maximum
loading of contaminants in a water body
[3] 1. East Sound, 2.
This document is also available in word
format